openpkg
/
openpkg-packages
1
0
Forka 0
Codice Problemi Pull Requests Progetti Rilasci Wiki Attività
483 Commit
1 Ramo (Branch)
2 Tag
561 MiB
Albero (Tree): f2ac18bb5f
Rami (Branch) Tag
${ item.name }
Create tag ${ searchTerm }
Crea branch ${ searchTerm }
da 'f2ac18bb5f'
${ noResults }
Grafico dei commit

14 Commit (f2ac18bb5f50b37e5b1e8482623fa334a0004819)

Autore SHA1 Messaggio Data
Dr. Ralf S. Engelschall 8cdd11b95c remove trailing zero to conform with new scheme
24 anni fa
Dr. Ralf S. Engelschall 1d99c07249 change to experimental
24 anni fa
Dr. Ralf S. Engelschall 139dc60d0a adjust distribution and release
24 anni fa
Dr. Ralf S. Engelschall bbcafd2d05 change linking fix to also cover Solaris
24 anni fa
Dr. Ralf S. Engelschall 59512f0111 fix zlib relationship
24 anni fa
Dr. Ralf S. Engelschall db8c270d2d Bump releases.
24 anni fa
Dr. Ralf S. Engelschall 75ec335002 add OpenPKG to copyright lines
24 anni fa
Dr. Ralf S. Engelschall 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
24 anni fa
Dr. Ralf S. Engelschall 53a172dd6e - switch from "sendmail "to "MTA" dependency - removed incorrect petidomo dependency - switched to use of "rpmtool config" - fix typo in install procedure
24 anni fa
Dr. Ralf S. Engelschall 92722d47de bump to the correct 0.9-20011025.0
24 anni fa
Dr. Ralf S. Engelschall 2c1ab0fbe0 upgrade dependencies because of l_branch usage
24 anni fa
Dr. Ralf S. Engelschall 6d5f952f16 Switch to using "YYYYMMDD.X" as Release for -CURRENT packages.
24 anni fa
Dr. Ralf S. Engelschall 0e74909640 Cleanup: 1. Move "Group:" below "Distribution:" 2. Use "The OpenPKG Project" for "Packager:" 3. Add type tag to "Distribution:" (default is now EXP)
24 anni fa
Dr. Ralf S. Engelschall 89ca6581e0 Force all packages to require openpkg-0.9-33
24 anni fa