|
00DEV
|
b24914da89
adjust paths
|
24 سال پیش |
|
a2ps
|
2eb4da2f3c
require flex and bison
|
24 سال پیش |
|
amd
|
8b3d6bbb54
requires also bison
|
24 سال پیش |
|
analog
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
antiword
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
apache
|
9db735680c
backout temporary fix now that I found out the problem in src2make
|
24 سال پیش |
|
apg
|
f8baf1e3be
fix building
|
24 سال پیش |
|
autoconf
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
autogen
|
d90eaa8988
autogen requires GNU make
|
24 سال پیش |
|
automake
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
axyftp
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
bash
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
bc
|
d0251f8c2f
bc requires flex
|
24 سال پیش |
|
bind
|
78036a83d6
BIND requires GNU make for correct DESTDIR handling
|
24 سال پیش |
|
binutils
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
bison
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
boxes
|
2e46633c36
fix dependencies
|
24 سال پیش |
|
bzip2
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
c2man
|
9934d637ae
fix Vendor
|
24 سال پیش |
|
calc
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
cftp
|
74dc266b0d
cftp uses Automake; fix Vendor name.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
cpio
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
curl
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
cvs
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
cvsweb
|
9f46caac70
upgrade to CVSweb 2.0.0
|
24 سال پیش |
|
db
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
dcron
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
delegate
|
a50f2fa2a7
upgrade to delegate 7.7.0
|
24 سال پیش |
|
dhcpd
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
diffutils
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
dmalloc
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
docbook
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
emacs
|
252cb65892
better to use GNU make and override also exec_prefix
|
24 سال پیش |
|
epm
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
exim
|
ad5b027723
make sure exim finds the db library
|
24 سال پیش |
|
fetchmail
|
83ff7aa2bf
fetchmail requires bison
|
24 سال پیش |
|
figlet
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
file
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
fileutils
|
4020b05be0
upgrade to fileutils 4.1.2
|
24 سال پیش |
|
findutils
|
87c8c259ae
Fix installation procedure (determined by src2make)
|
24 سال پیش |
|
flawfinder
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
flex
|
7436e10be8
switch back to the release version
|
24 سال پیش |
|
freetype
|
802ab577a0
requires GNU make
|
24 سال پیش |
|
gated
|
6ad7376e9f
try to fix even more things in gated
|
24 سال پیش |
|
gawk
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
gcc
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
gd
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
gettext
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
ghostscript
|
d46630bb78
try to fix multithreading related building
|
24 سال پیش |
|
gimp
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
glib
|
98c7f9ad15
fix installation
|
24 سال پیش |
|
glimpse
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
gnupg
|
e554402921
GnuPG uses GNU Automake
|
24 سال پیش |
|
graphviz
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
grep
|
28960b9ef5
grep uses GNU automake
|
24 سال پیش |
|
grepmail
|
c791cdf678
fixed group
|
24 سال پیش |
|
groff
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
gtk
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
guile
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
gup
|
32315cb662
fix building of gup under Linux and Solaris
|
24 سال پیش |
|
gzip
|
0b6c3b5bcf
upgrade to gzip 1.3.2
|
24 سال پیش |
|
heise
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
hexer
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
htdig
|
764af3ebc8
htdig requires flex
|
24 سال پیش |
|
html2latex
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
imagemagick
|
222e546b0f
downgrade to 5.4.0 because 5.4.1 is broken
|
24 سال پیش |
|
imapd
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
imlib
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
indent
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
infozip
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
inn
|
2a36573f16
upgrade to INN 2.3.2.20011124
|
24 سال پیش |
|
instant
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
iozone
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
ircd
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
ircii
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
iselect
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
ispell
|
1685eb8905
fix URL
|
24 سال پیش |
|
its4
|
c791cdf678
fixed group
|
24 سال پیش |
|
jitterbug
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
jpeg
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
kermit
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
lame
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
less
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
lftp
|
2e5681fd9f
upgrade to lftp 2.4.7
|
24 سال پیش |
|
libiconv
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
libpcap
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
librsync
|
e3b798fe85
New package: librsync 0.9.5 This is the rsync(1) algorithm put into a nice new library plus an interesting rdiff(1) program.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
libtool
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
libxml
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
libxslt
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
limo
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
links
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
lmtp2nntp
|
702b2968d3
upgrade to lmtp2nntp 1.1.1
|
24 سال پیش |
|
logsurfer
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
lrzsz
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
lsof
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
lynx
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
m4
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
magicpoint
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
mailgrep
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
majordomo
|
90b4039985
Hmmm... Majordomo is still horribly broken. We have to investigate later again.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
make
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
mc
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
minicom
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
mirror
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
mkgallery
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
mkisofs
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
mm
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
mng
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
mozilla
|
ff6908c4de
blind update of (perhaps still broken) Mozilla
|
24 سال پیش |
|
mpack
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
mpg123
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
mtools
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
mutt
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
myodbc
|
926d3cc2f0
upgrade to 2.50.39
|
24 سال پیش |
|
mysql
|
dde2f49600
upgrade to mysql 3.23.45
|
24 سال پیش |
|
nail
|
3065b68180
upgrade to nail 9.28
|
24 سال پیش |
|
nano
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
ncftp
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
ncurses
|
dd7aeed044
fix ncurses build
|
24 سال پیش |
|
netcat
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
nmap
|
3d2eaadd1d
upgrade to nmap 2.54b30
|
24 سال پیش |
|
nntpcache
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
nslint
|
20d6eb69a5
new package: nslint 2.1a2
|
24 سال پیش |
|
ntp
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
openjade
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
openldap
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
openpkg
|
b371ccd115
fix bootstrap version
|
24 سال پیش |
|
openssh
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
openssl
|
157ac88ac8
fix compilation
|
24 سال پیش |
|
orbit
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
par
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
patch
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
pcre
|
e08e072ee3
upgrade to PCRE 3.7
|
24 سال پیش |
|
pdksh
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
perl
|
f3e3a16fdb
fix version
|
24 سال پیش |
|
perl-gd
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
perl-ssl
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
petidomo
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
pgp
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
php
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
pinfo
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
png
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
portsentry
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
postfix
|
e0200c1030
upgrade unstable version
|
24 سال پیش |
|
prngd
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
procmail
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
proftpd
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
psutils
|
9934d637ae
fix Vendor
|
24 سال پیش |
|
pth
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
pureftpd
|
74fbc72124
upgrade to pure-ftpd 1.0.3
|
24 سال پیش |
|
python
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
qpopper
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
qt
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
rc
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
rcs
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
recode
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
rfc
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
rrdtool
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
rsync
|
64ed52c654
temporarily disable this
|
24 سال پیش |
|
ruby
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
samba
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
sasl
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
scanssh
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
screen
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
sed
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
sendmail
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
sfio
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
sgml
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
sgmlfmt
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
sharutils
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
shellutils
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
shiela
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
shtool
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
siege
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
sitecopy
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
skey
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
slang
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
smtpfeed
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
snmp
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
squid
|
9934d637ae
fix Vendor
|
24 سال پیش |
|
ssmtp
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
str
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
strace
|
9b2b070de1
fix strace for FreeBSD
|
24 سال پیش |
|
stunnel
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
suck
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
sudo
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
tar
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
tcl
|
44239dd8f7
fix vendor
|
24 سال پیش |
|
tcpdump
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
tcsh
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
termutils
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
tetex
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
texinfo
|
2c1a2a51fc
upgrade to 4.0d because 4.0 fails on installation
|
24 سال پیش |
|
textutils
|
ce1176e8d7
upgrade to textutils 2.0.17
|
24 سال پیش |
|
tiff
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
tin
|
2db78e6433
upgrade to tin 1.5.10
|
24 سال پیش |
|
txt2man
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
txt2pdf
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
txt2regex
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
units
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
unixodbc
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
ups
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
uucp
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
uudeview
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
vim
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
w3m
|
c812051608
upgrade to W3M 0.2.2 inu 1.1
|
24 سال پیش |
|
wget
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
whatmask
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
whois
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
wml
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
xdelta
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
xmake
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
xmame
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
xterm
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
zebra
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
zlib
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
zope
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
zsh
|
2171079274
Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled.
|
24 سال پیش |
|
00README
|
ed12d92e1f
Initial revision
|
24 سال پیش |
Ralf S. Engelschall
32315cb662
fix building of gup under Linux and Solaris