Halaman utama Jelajahi Bantuan
Masuk
openpkg
/
openpkg-packages
Liatin 2
Bintangi 0
Fork 0
Berkas Masalah 0 Tarik Permintaan 0

OpenPKG Packages (Open-Source) http://openpkg.org/

Pohon: 8ff52d46f2
Ranting Tag
openpkg-pack...
ZIP TAR.GZ
Ralf S. Engelschall 8ff52d46f2 "Enhance packages" for OpenPKG 1.0 release ;) 24 tahun lalu
00DEV b24914da89 adjust paths 24 tahun lalu
a2ps 2eb4da2f3c require flex and bison 24 tahun lalu
amd 8b3d6bbb54 requires also bison 24 tahun lalu
analog 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
antiword 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
apache 9db735680c backout temporary fix now that I found out the problem in src2make 24 tahun lalu
apg f8baf1e3be fix building 24 tahun lalu
autoconf 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
autogen d90eaa8988 autogen requires GNU make 24 tahun lalu
automake 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
axyftp 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
bash 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
bc d0251f8c2f bc requires flex 24 tahun lalu
bind 8ff52d46f2 "Enhance packages" for OpenPKG 1.0 release ;) 24 tahun lalu
binutils 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
bison 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
boxes 2e46633c36 fix dependencies 24 tahun lalu
bzip2 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
c2man 9934d637ae fix Vendor 24 tahun lalu
calc 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
cftp 74dc266b0d cftp uses Automake; fix Vendor name. 24 tahun lalu
cpio 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
curl 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
cvs 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
cvsweb 9f46caac70 upgrade to CVSweb 2.0.0 24 tahun lalu
db 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
dcron 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
delegate a50f2fa2a7 upgrade to delegate 7.7.0 24 tahun lalu
dhcpd 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
diffutils 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
dmalloc 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
docbook 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
emacs 252cb65892 better to use GNU make and override also exec_prefix 24 tahun lalu
epm 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
exim ad5b027723 make sure exim finds the db library 24 tahun lalu
fetchmail 83ff7aa2bf fetchmail requires bison 24 tahun lalu
figlet 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
file 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
fileutils 4020b05be0 upgrade to fileutils 4.1.2 24 tahun lalu
findutils 87c8c259ae Fix installation procedure (determined by src2make) 24 tahun lalu
flawfinder 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
flex 7436e10be8 switch back to the release version 24 tahun lalu
freetype 802ab577a0 requires GNU make 24 tahun lalu
gated 6ad7376e9f try to fix even more things in gated 24 tahun lalu
gawk 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
gcc 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
gd 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
gettext 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
ghostscript d46630bb78 try to fix multithreading related building 24 tahun lalu
gimp 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
glib 98c7f9ad15 fix installation 24 tahun lalu
glimpse 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
gnupg e554402921 GnuPG uses GNU Automake 24 tahun lalu
graphviz 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
grep 28960b9ef5 grep uses GNU automake 24 tahun lalu
grepmail c791cdf678 fixed group 24 tahun lalu
groff 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
gtk 66779fabdc Gtk uses Automake 24 tahun lalu
guile 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
gup 32315cb662 fix building of gup under Linux and Solaris 24 tahun lalu
gzip 0b6c3b5bcf upgrade to gzip 1.3.2 24 tahun lalu
heise 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
hexer 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
htdig abe8686bd8 htdig dislikes parallel building 24 tahun lalu
html2latex 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
imagemagick 2f2f93b151 try to fix Imagemagick for Solaris 24 tahun lalu
imapd fe4f785d05 add missing linux entry 24 tahun lalu
imlib 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
indent 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
infozip 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
inn 2a36573f16 upgrade to INN 2.3.2.20011124 24 tahun lalu
instant 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
iozone 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
ircd 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
ircii 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
iselect 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
ispell 4992149fec fix installation under Solaris 24 tahun lalu
its4 c791cdf678 fixed group 24 tahun lalu
jitterbug 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
jpeg 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
kermit 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
lame 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
less 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
lftp 2e5681fd9f upgrade to lftp 2.4.7 24 tahun lalu
libiconv 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
libpcap 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
librsync e3b798fe85 New package: librsync 0.9.5 This is the rsync(1) algorithm put into a nice new library plus an interesting rdiff(1) program. 24 tahun lalu
libtool 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
libxml 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
libxslt 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
limo 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
links 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
lmtp2nntp 702b2968d3 upgrade to lmtp2nntp 1.1.1 24 tahun lalu
logsurfer 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
lrzsz 7a0020d469 Fix building under Linux and installation under Solaris. 24 tahun lalu
lsof 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
lynx 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
m4 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
magicpoint 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
mailgrep 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
majordomo 90b4039985 Hmmm... Majordomo is still horribly broken. We have to investigate later again. 24 tahun lalu
make 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
mc 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
minicom c8f6087d61 minicom requires GNU make 24 tahun lalu
mirror 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
mkgallery 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
mkisofs 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
mm 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
mng 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
mozilla ff6908c4de blind update of (perhaps still broken) Mozilla 24 tahun lalu
mpack 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
mpg123 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
mtools 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
mutt 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
myodbc 926d3cc2f0 upgrade to 2.50.39 24 tahun lalu
mysql dde2f49600 upgrade to mysql 3.23.45 24 tahun lalu
nail 3065b68180 upgrade to nail 9.28 24 tahun lalu
nano 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
ncftp 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
ncurses dd7aeed044 fix ncurses build 24 tahun lalu
netcat 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
nmap 3d2eaadd1d upgrade to nmap 2.54b30 24 tahun lalu
nntpcache 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
nslint 20d6eb69a5 new package: nslint 2.1a2 24 tahun lalu
ntp 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
openjade 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
openldap 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
openpkg 560d6c92e3 update OpenPGP stuff 24 tahun lalu
openssh 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
openssl 157ac88ac8 fix compilation 24 tahun lalu
orbit 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
par 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
patch 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
pcre e08e072ee3 upgrade to PCRE 3.7 24 tahun lalu
pdksh 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
perl f3e3a16fdb fix version 24 tahun lalu
perl-gd 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
perl-ssl 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
petidomo 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
pgp 0d7a85bfda fix building 24 tahun lalu
php a8cccd87b4 php requires flex and bison 24 tahun lalu
pinfo 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
png 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
portsentry 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
postfix ea8f53223d fix perl dependencies 24 tahun lalu
prngd 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
procmail 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
proftpd 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
psutils 9934d637ae fix Vendor 24 tahun lalu
pth 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
pureftpd 74fbc72124 upgrade to pure-ftpd 1.0.3 24 tahun lalu
python 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
qpopper 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
qt 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
rc 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
rcs 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
recode 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
rfc 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
rrdtool 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
rsync 8ff52d46f2 "Enhance packages" for OpenPKG 1.0 release ;) 24 tahun lalu
ruby 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
samba 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
sasl 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
scanssh 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
screen 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
sed 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
sendmail 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
sfio 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
sgml 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
sgmlfmt 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
sharutils 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
shellutils 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
shiela 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
shtool 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
siege 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
sitecopy 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
skey 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
slang 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
smtpfeed 07bd74f68b fix smtpfeed daemon Makefile 24 tahun lalu
snmp 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
squid 9934d637ae fix Vendor 24 tahun lalu
ssmtp 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
str 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
strace 9b2b070de1 fix strace for FreeBSD 24 tahun lalu
stunnel 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
suck 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
sudo 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
tar 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
tcl 44239dd8f7 fix vendor 24 tahun lalu
tcpdump 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
tcsh 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
termutils 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
tetex cecccffe04 - teTeX requires flex and bison - by default do not built with X11 stuff (only xdvi!) but allow one to enable it again. 24 tahun lalu
texinfo 2c1a2a51fc upgrade to 4.0d because 4.0 fails on installation 24 tahun lalu
textutils ce1176e8d7 upgrade to textutils 2.0.17 24 tahun lalu
tiff 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
tin 2db78e6433 upgrade to tin 1.5.10 24 tahun lalu
txt2man 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
txt2pdf 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
txt2regex 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
units 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
unixodbc 427aafd5cf unixodbc requires bison 24 tahun lalu
ups 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
uucp 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
uudeview 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
vim 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
w3m c812051608 upgrade to W3M 0.2.2 inu 1.1 24 tahun lalu
wget 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
whatmask 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
whois b6fffb223c upgrade to whois 4.5.14 24 tahun lalu
wml 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
xdelta 60be52ef85 xdelta requires zlib 24 tahun lalu
xmake 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
xmame 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
xterm 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
zebra 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
zlib 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
zope 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
zsh 2171079274 Hmmmm.... goodbye good thought out but in practice unusable %{l_branch} variable. We have to use a static value here (implies manual editing again), because else source and binary RPM filenames won't match if binary is built one or more days after the source was rolled. 24 tahun lalu
00README ed12d92e1f Initial revision 24 tahun lalu